Letter: EFAs are not fiscally responsible

Published: 02-14-2025 5:23 PM

In a recent letter by Ryan Bilodeau, he claims Education Freedom Accounts save taxpayers money. I’m glad he is a theology teacher and not a math teacher as his calculations don’t add up. A student outside of the public school system that costs taxpayers $0 dollars today will cost taxpayers $5,000 after expanding EFAs. How is that fiscally responsible?

Mr. Bilodeau’s claim that EFAs will save taxpayers $20,000 a year for students in public schools that leave is also faulty. A single student leaving a district does not save $20,000 because a single student has no impact on costs like heating, electricity and even staffing. Enough students would need to leave in a single grade level to eliminate a staff position to save any real money.

Voucher advocates need to acknowledge EFAs aren’t about school choice or about money following a student. EFAs are a license for the wealthy and for private schools to grift taxpayers. Any elected official that supports EFAs needs to acknowledge they are not a fiscal conservative.

Adam Czarkowski

Penacook

Yesterday's Most Read Articles

‘Like my child had died’: For parents trying to help their kids, New Hampshire’s mental health system forces a hard decision
Police: Cache of drugs, gun seized in search
House committee defunds relief program for mothers and children, spares SNAP incentives
Loudon Country Store to reopen with larger menu and some Indian food
Zach Emerson, a cross-country innovator leaving a lasting impact on Hopkinton
Andru Volinsky takes aim at fellow Democrats in new book chronicling the school funding fight