NH Lottery considers Andy Sanborn’s casino license revoked; Sanborn accuses state of trying to sink sale

Laurie and Andy Sanborn own The Draft Sports Bar and Grill and Concord Casino located on South Main Street in Concord, New Hampshire.

Laurie and Andy Sanborn own The Draft Sports Bar and Grill and Concord Casino located on South Main Street in Concord, New Hampshire. Monitor file

By SRUTHI GOPALAKRISHNAN

Monitor staff

Published: 10-15-2024 2:29 PM

Modified: 10-15-2024 4:33 PM


The New Hampshire Lottery Commission is asking a judge to clarify his recent decision regarding the revocation of Andy Sanborn’s casino license, raising questions about the authority behind the ruling and its future implications.

Meanwhile, Sanborn’s attorneys are asking the judge for a partial rehearing to extend the deadline until fifteen days after the state completes its review of a proposed buyer for the Concord Casino on South Main Street in Concord.

In a Sept 22 order, Judge Gregory Albert denied a request from Sanborn’s attorneys to extend the deadline for selling his casino, stating he “lacks the authority to grant the relief.”

But he was sympathetic to Sanborn’s plight and didn’t shut the door completely. Albert gave both parties 15 business days to request a rehearing – and if Sanborn’s attorneys pursued that option, the case could face additional delays, potentially escalating to the New Hampshire Supreme Court.

The Lottery Commission wants to be clear that further delays will not affect Sanborn’s license, which it considers revoked as of Oct. 1.

Yet Sanborn’s attorneys accuse the Lottery Commission of deliberately ignoring the intent of Albert’s order, which was to delay the revocation of Sanborn’s license for a brief period – and they insist the license has not been revoked.

“The state is free to disagree with that ruling, but the state is not free to defy it,” attorney Zachary Hafer wrote. “Yet, in its brief, the state announces that it is acting as if the order means the opposite of what it says.”

Sanborn’s lawyers accused the Attorney General’s Office and Lottery Commission of dragging their feet in approving the proposed buyer for the Concord Casino in order to vindictively sink the sale.  

Article continues after...

Yesterday's Most Read Articles

Shamir Darjee immigrated to Concord knowing no English. Now the 20-year-old just bought his family a house.
Squirrels, magic mushrooms and cat claws: A look at New Hampshire’s offbeat bills
Opinion: Let’s keep our forests as forests
‘Woefully unprepared’ hiker refused to leave Sno-Cat atop Mt. Washington
Update: Man arrested in Pleasant Street barricade incident in Concord
Thorne’s of Concord to close storefront, shift toward intimacy coaching and education

“Over the last two weeks, rather than approve the buyer and put this case to rest, the state has dropped any pretense and made clear it intends to do what it can to delay and block a sale,” Sanborn’s attorneys wrote.

Sanborn was forced to surrender his gaming license and sell his casino after a joint investigation by the New Hampshire Attorney General and the Lottery Commission last year revealed that he had fraudulently obtained and misused $844,000 in pandemic relief funds — money that was meant for small businesses, not casinos.

The investigation revealed that Sanborn had used the COVID-19 relief funds to finance a lavish lifestyle, including the purchase of a Ferrari for his wife, State Rep. Laurie Sanborn. A criminal investigation against Sanborn is also underway.

Albert’s decision last month followed a previous order by former Judge Michael King, who mandated that Sanborn sell the business by Sept. 30 or risk a two-year revocation of his gaming license.

Since King stepped down, Albert presided over the case. In a motion filed on Friday, attorneys for the Lottery Commission sought clarification on Albert’s decision, given King’s order setting a deadline that was made nine months earlier.

The Lottery Commission said that it interprets Albert’s decision as meaning he has “not suspended the order in a manner that would create an extension.” It is requesting that Albert clarify that his decision relative to King’s deadline “would not have the practical effect of extending the suspension period.”

Sanborn’s attorneys on Tuesday said Albert’s order was abundantly clear and they want the request for clarification denied.

“The state can no longer credibly deny that it is purposefully attempting to sink this deal — in part by delaying its review of the buyer,” Sanborn’s lawyers wrote.

Albert said last month he believed that an extension was justified because if the deadline was enforced on Oct. 1, Concord Casino would become “virtually worthless,” as its most valuable asset is its existing license.

A new buyer could apply for a license, but they would face many challenges — finding a location, securing proper zoning, acquiring gaming machines, and hiring staff — all of which would already be in place if the casino is sold with its license intact.

These challenges would be greatly reduced if the Concord Casino is sold along with its license, location, and operational machines, Albert said.

The sale of Concord Casino has been difficult due to concerns from potential buyers about Sanborn’s legal troubles, which might lead to complications for the new owner.

Sruthi Gopalakrishnan can be reached at sgopalakrishnan@cmonitor.com